Home > Books, Movies > One Book To Rule Them All

One Book To Rule Them All

October 28th, 2009 Leave a comment Go to comments

I like to consider myself fairly well read.  That doesn’t mean that I’m particularly voracious in my reading habits, but I think I’ve read my fair share of diverse authors covering many topics.  I have a feeling that I’ve read more books than most, but the one book that I never got into was The Lord Of The Rings.  I’ve had this particular tome sitting idle in my library for quite some time, and have stared at its alarmingly red spine as it jutted out from the upper bookshelf like a crooked tooth for many years.  Last week I finally decided to correct this textual shortcoming of mine and crack into this imposing novel, and now I find that I’m unable to put it down.  I’m but a mere 200 pages in, yet I’m amazed at how much of the book is missing from the Peter Jackson films (Frodo selling his home, less intimidating (and easily fooled) Black Riders, travel through the Old Forest, dinner with the elves, Tom Bombadil, talk with Farmer Maggot, etc).

Now, I fully understand the need to parse out the less important bits from the movies to make for a more digestible end product, but after reading what little I have so far, I feel I would have really loved to have seen some of these missing scenes on the big screen.  But then again, thinking about it, if the movies retained a painful loyalty to the book and included each and every scene from the novel, I could envision the movie easily having a runtime of 20+ hours.  As much as I love the extended versions of the movie trilogy as they now stand, I think I’d go insane if I had to absorb all of the original material in one theatrical sitting.  


It’s funny how a movie such as Where The Wild Things Are used as its springboard a children’s novel that’s composed of a scant ten sentences.  From that meager source material a two-hour movie was produced, with the holes in the story having to be filled in by an imaginative team of writers and producers.  There was so much that had to be (re)envisioned to make for a cohesive story simply for lack of original source material.  On the other end of the spectrum is a novel like The Lord Of The Rings, where the story is so far reaching and overflowing that there’s a need to have to ignore vast swaths of text and whittle down the over-arcing storyline to fit into a (still impressive) six hour movie. 

Ah, but there I go, rambling again.  I think I’ll activate that brain/fingers filter right now, power down the laptop, and pick up a good book.  ”Hey!  Come derry dol!  Hop along, my hearties!“…

Bookmark and Share
Categories: Books, Movies Tags: ,
  1. October 29th, 2009 at 00:03 | #1

    As massive as the LOTR movies were they can’t compare with the books. The books are pretty awesome. But then again when has a movie really been better than the book version anyway. So much more can go into a book.

    What about the Hobbit book? If not read it before the movie comes out. I was a big fantasy reader as a kid but not so much these days. I read now mostly about people dying at sea or on a mountain.

    One thing that make me sad is that my kids did not read The Lion The Witch and the Wardrobe before the movies came out. Loved those books as kids.

  2. SDShannonS
    SDShannonS
    October 29th, 2009 at 08:07 | #2

    Wait…

    So… you’re saying that…

    You haven’t read Lord of the Rings?

    Like, seriously, haven’t read it at all?

    /me reassesses his generally positive opinion of HermanTurnip

  3. SDShannonS
    SDShannonS
    October 29th, 2009 at 08:08 | #3

    And I agree with the above poster that if you haven’t read The Hobbit, read it before reading Lord of the Rings. They’re sequential.

  4. October 29th, 2009 at 16:44 | #4

    But…but…I saw the cartoon!

  1. No trackbacks yet.